How Coventry City’s £40m CBS Arena takeover really impacted Frank Lampard’s summer transfer budget

Add as preferred source on Google

Coventry City are on fire so far this season, despite being one of the least active teams in the transfer market. Here, we discuss why they did so little, and whether the CBS Arena played a part in that.

Frank Lampard has worked wonders since taking over at Coventry City, turning the Sky Blues into genuine promotion contenders over the last year.

The free-scoring Sky Blues are looking like they’ll be in the mix this season once more, but some Coventry fans are unhappy with the lack of signings this summer.

Only four new players came through the door during the transfer window, with some experts claiming it leaves Coventry vulnerable given their lack of squad depth. So, why did Coventry avoid dipping into the market this summer?

• READ MORE: Birmingham City fans fume at ‘scandalous’ Coventry City announcement ahead of Championship clash

Coventry City’s transfer budget was not impacted by CBS Arena purchase

Our resident finance expert Adam Williams discussed this matter with us, with reference to the fact Coventry just paid £40m to own the CBS Arena, a deal Williams says should not have impacted the club’s transfer budget at all.

He said: “As far as I’m aware, there has been no detail about how the club have financed the stadium purchase. But I personally doubt that it would have had any knock-on effect on transfer business in the summer.

“There has been no statement of capital update on Companies House, which means – unless we get one very soon, after the fact – the deal for the Coventry Building Society Arena has probably been funded by debt of some kind. It will likely be a mortgage style agreement with a bank, which Coventry City will pay off over time with interest. And reportedly, that’s for about £40m.

“We will have to wait until we have the 2025-26 accounts to see how much they are paying annually, but it will probably be less or at least roughly equivalent to what they were paying in rent to Mike Ashley. In that sense, the debt shouldn’t impact transfer business any more than the lease agreement had been doing.”

Indeed, owning the stadium now can only be a good thing, not just for the emotional aspect, but from a financial point of view, too.

He added: “Now, you have the stadium as an asset on your balance sheet, which can help you attract investment in the future and, crucially, it allows you to budget more reliably as opposed to re-negotiating the lease agreement every few years.

“There are all sorts of ancillary benefits too, such as being able to benefit from the stadium as a commercial venue with concerts and so forth all year round. Commercial and matchday growth has been impressive in recent seasons, and this will accelerate that.”

• READ MORE: Frank Lampard can show Norwich City what they missed out on in 2021 with high-flying Coventry City

Keeping key players was more important than signing new ones for Frank Lampard

There may not have been many incomings for Coventry City this summer, but there were also very few outgoings, too. Key players like Haji Wright and Jack Rudoni stayed put, with Ben Sheaf the main departure that anyone would have lost any sleep over.

On this, Williams said: “Coventry had quite a modest transfer window on paper. However, from the outside, it looks as though the summer was going to be about keeping hold of their best players as opposed to having massive churn in the squad. So I think this is more correlation than causation.”

abc

In many ways, consistency and momentum are Coventry’s main strengths now. They’ve had a year of working under Lampard’s system, the players know what is expected of them, and they can flourish as time goes on.

Lampard has told Coventry chiefs that this squad can get promoted, now they all need to prove it, or that £40m spent on the stadium will only lead to more question marks.